By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:
Distinguish between scientific notation, engineering notation, and prefix notation.
Convert numbers and measurements among the three systems.
Recognize when each notation is most useful in scientific and engineering contexts.
Reflect on common misconceptions and errors to strengthen productive habits of checking and noticing.
Imagine you’re an engineer measuring a capacitor that is 0.000000047 farads. How should you report this?
In scientific notation: \(4.7\times10^{−8}\)
In engineering notation: \(47\times10^{−9}\)
In prefix notation: \(47nF\)
All three are mathematically equivalent, but each highlights different aspects. This lesson will help you understand why and how to use them.
Any number written as \(a\times10^{n}\), where \(1\leq a \leq10\).
Example: \(3.2\times 10^{5}\).
Variation focus: Exponents can be any integer.
Similar, but exponents must be multiples of 3.
Example: \(320\times 10^{3}=3.20 \times 10^{5}\).
Variation focus: Notice how values are shifted to match powers of 10 divisible by 3.
Uses SI prefixes (k, M, µ, n) that align with multiples of 3 exponents. (Table of SI prefixes below)
Example: \(320\times 10^{3} V=320 kV\).
Variation focus: Emphasize correspondence: k → \(10^3\), M → \(10^6\), µ → \(10^P{−6}\).
Example 1: \(0.00056m\)
Variation emphasis: See how the same quantity is represented differently.
Example 2: \(3.2 \times 10^{8}\)Hz
Variation emphasis: Exponent flexibility vs. engineering multiples of 3 vs. practical communication.
Task 1: Spot the Error
A student writes:
\[2.5mA=2.5 \times 10^{-6}A\]
Is this correct? If not, correct it.
Try writing the value in all three notations.
Task 2: Conversion Challenge
Convert \(6.8 \times 10^{-9}\)s into:
Scientific notation
Engineering notation
Prefix notation
Task 3: Application Problem
The speed of light is \(3.0\times 10^8\) m/s.
How far does light travel in \(7.5\times 10^{−9}\)s?
Compute the distance.
Express the answer in scientific, engineering, and prefix notation.
When is scientific notation more useful than prefix notation?
Why do engineers prefer engineering notation or prefixes in circuit design?
Which system do you find easiest to misapply? Why?
Name | Symbol | Multiplying Facotr |
tera | \(T\) | \(10^{12}\) |
giga | \(G\) | \(10^9\) |
mega | \(M\) | \(10^6\) |
kilo | \(k\) | \(10^3\) |
hecto | \(h\) | \(10^2\) |
deca | \(da\) | \(10^1\) |
deci | \(d\) | \(10^{-1}\) |
centi | \(c\) | \(10^{-2}\) |
milli | \(m\) | \(10^{-3}\) |
micro | \(\mu\) | \(10^{-6}\) |
nano | \(n\) | \(10^{-9}\) |
pico | \(p\) | \(10^{-12}\) |
1. Convert \(7.2 \times 10^{-7}\) F into engineering and prefix notation.
2. Which of the following are equivalent?
3. Explain one situation where scientific notation communicates more clearly than prefix notation.
Designed by Matthew Cheung. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.